Game theory model · 5 Jun 2026 · public-safe brief
The election is close. The post-election game depends on margin.
Derivado de the Central Electoral INFRATEK marco técnico. The model favors Fujimori at 62%, but the strategic risk lives in narrow margins and disputed incentives.
Core game read
The 1-3 point band is the dangerous equilibrium: close enough to contest,
wide enough to survive challenge, and valuable enough for political positioning.
Undecided allocation scenarios
| Scenario | Split | Fujimori | Sanchez | Margin | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A, Strong Fujimori | 70/30 | 53.6% | 46.4% | +7.2 | 15% |
| B, Lean Fujimori | 60/40 | 52.2% | 47.8% | +4.4 | 30% |
| C, Even split | 50/50 | 50.9% | 49.1% | +1.8 | 25% |
| D, Lean Sanchez | 40/60 | 49.5% | 50.5% | -1.0 | 20% |
| E, Strong Sanchez | 30/70 | 48.2% | 51.8% | -3.6 | 10% |
Post-electoral paths
> 3 points
Concession pressure dominates. Legal challenge has low expected value.
1-3 points
Selective challenges become rational for positioning, not necessarily reversal.
< 1 point
Highest dispute risk. Timeline can stretch while institutions adjudicate.
Publication rule
This is a probabilistic model, not an official result. ONPE/JNE, observers and reproducible
acta-level evidence replace pre-election inference once available.